Why the Uncommon Leadership Model is the better way

High-performing organizations understand that effective leadership is critical for success. Yes – management happens every day. Leadership is more important. John Maxwell, a leadership guru, likes to say, “everything rises and falls on leadership.” Last week I described the corporate culture created when an organization focuses on management more than leadership. I called this organization viewpoint the Common Management Model. This week I will provide a different view. I call it the Uncommon Leadership Model.

Organizations that emphasize leadership build better culture.
The Uncommon Leadership Model –  leadership is emphasized more than management.

Leadership is emphasized – you see it and hear it

The first thing to notice about the Uncommon Leadership Model is the structure. It is not the classic pyramid that many organizations use to task organize. Rather it is an inverted pyramid. It turns the Common Management Model on its head. In an organization that thinks this way, leaders talk about their purpose – why their organization exists. Their mission statement is clear – what are they trying to do? You do not climb to the top of the ladder by managing more resources. Instead, you receive more leadership responsibility as your leadership abilities grow.

I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion.

Alexander the Great

Leaders are expected to increase their impact over time

Leaders accomplish the mission and produce results. Their impact grows over time. As a leader’s ability grows so does her career. Below is a short description of the levels in the Uncommon Leadership Level starting from the bottom. Please note that the numbers included are representative – they will vary by organization. For example, in the military, the numbers are much larger. In a start-up company, the numbers will likely be less.

Levels in the Uncommon Leadership Model

  1. Leader – the first line of leadership. You are a team leader. Usually responsible for leading a team of 10 or fewer members. It is vital you learn the fundamentals of leadership before progressing to the next level.
  2. Senior Leader – the next level of leadership. You are a leader of leaders. Usually responsible for a team of teams (3-5 teams) that are led by leaders. Typical responsibility includes 30-50 people. It is important you understand how to lead via your leaders. Otherwise, you will struggle at this level and may drive the people who work for you crazy.
  3. Executive Leader – the first level of executive leadership. You are a leader of senior leaders (3 to 5 senior leaders). Your team includes many teams, multiple levels, and more complexity. Typical responsibility includes 100-150 people. Your ability to directly affect performance continues to diminish. At this level, you must be able to lead your senior leaders effectively.
  4. Senior Executive Leader – the next level of executive leadership. At this point, you are a leader of executive leaders (3 to 5 executive leaders). Your team is big – many levels, many leaders, many teams. Typical responsibility includes 300-500 or more people. At this point in your career, you have reached rarified air and face huge expectations. You must be able to effectively lead executive leaders.
  5. The top of the pyramid. Some organizations offer higher levels of leadership with even more responsibility. I will not include any more levels. I do not feel qualified to help leaders at these levels. If you achieve this level and need help – hire an executive coach. It is worth the investment.

The focus is on producing better results

In the Uncommon Leadership Model results matter more than resources. Your value in the organization is not measured by how many resources you have, but by the results you deliver. As a leader, you may be asked to do more with less. Greater responsibility may not equate to more resources. More management may not work in this model. Leaders focus on making things happen, not just keeping the trains running. An organization that follows this model is never satisfied with the status quo. Leaders are always looking for a better way.

Leaders are always looking for a better way.

The uncommon leadership model cultivates a healthy culture

Helping others grow is important. If you are going to succeed as a senior leader it is important that you help your leaders become more effective. You are incentivized to make them successful, not just yourself. The same is true for executive and senior executive leaders. You help yourself by helping others grow. High performers tend to thrive in this type of organization. They enjoy the constant challenge to produce better results. This focus on leadership can create a healthy culture distinguished by three characteristics.

1. Collaboration is expected in the uncommon Leadership Model

Working together across the organization is the norm. An effective leader knows when to seek help from others. Rather than limit the ideas to her own team the leader will collaborate with others and identify the best approach to accomplish the mission. I saw this characteristic firsthand when serving in the military. We worked with rival units, other branches, various services, and even different countries to accomplish the mission. The best example comes from my time spent in Bosnia. The Russians were even part of our team. Their relationships with the Serbs were critical for making the peacekeeping operations successful. Bosnia would not be where it is today as a nation without the help of the Russians, and many other countries.

The US worked with Russia during Bosnian peacekeeping operations.
The US worked with Russia during Bosnian peacekeeping operations.

2. Innovation is promoted

Effective leaders understand that innovation is critical for survival in today’s hyper-competitive business environment. If you fail to innovate your company may not exist in the future. Think of all the companies that failed to innovate and are no longer here. Amazon continues to crush competitors through innovation. In the Uncommon Leadership Model leaders always look for a better way to accomplish the mission. After action reviews are completed to identify best practices (approaches that work), and lessons learned (things that went wrong). The organization learns from its mistakes and identifies new approaches to avoid repeated mistakes.

Innovation is necessary to survive in today's business environment.
Innovation is necessary to outpace your competition in today’s business environment.

3. Empowerment is encouraged in the Uncommon Leadership Model

No one allows micromanagement. Good leaders empower their people without telling them what to do all the time. Seasoned senior leaders trust their leaders. They train their leaders so that they need minimum supervision. Good executive leaders assign responsibility to their senior leaders so that they feel empowered to make it happen. Great senior executive leaders delegate the appropriate level of decision-making authority to their leaders so that they do not require unnecessary oversight.

The Uncommon Leadership Model is the better way

All the Way Leadership! believes that the Uncommon Leadership Model is the better way to run your organization. Next week I will explain in more detail why. Strive to be different, to be better. You can do it, and we are here to help you make it happen.

ATW! will make you a better leader

I hope you join me on this journey to raise the next generation of leaders. The world is in desperate need of more great leaders. Women and men who lead with confidence, clarity, and creativity. It’s time to become the leader that your world needs. Let’s go All The Way!

All The Way Leadership!

Why the Common Management Model does not work

I worked as a manager and a leader in multiple organizations for more than twenty-five years. I served as an Officer in the United States military and taught at a top-ranked university. Currently, I work for a leading management consulting company in the private industry. Over the past decade, I provided consulting services to many clients who work for the US government. Three things I have noticed working across all these different organizations. First, each one of them is unique. They have a specific mission, a way of doing business, and corporate culture. Second, they all task organize in different ways to accomplish their mission. No organization looks exactly like another. The same is true of companies across the world. Third, they all struggle to deliver results on a regular basis. High performance is not the norm. Why is that? The common management model does not work.

Most US corporations today are over-managed and under-led. They need to develop their capacity to exercise leadership.

John Kotter

Many organizations focus too much on management

As John Kotter’s quote points out, most organizations are over-managed and under-led. In the upper ranks, management rules over leadership. When the focus is management a predictable corporate culture is created. It is based on what I am calling the Common Management Model (shown below). In this blog, I will describe this organizational viewpoint and the culture it creates.

Many organizations emphasize management more than leadership. It is a mistake.
The Common Management Model –  organizations emphasize management more than leadership.

You climb to the top by managing more

The way you advance your career in the Common Management Model is simple – manage more. First, you start as a supervisor, someone who observes and directs the work of others. Simply make sure the work gets done. Next, you become a manager. Someone who manages supervisors. If you don’t screw up you eventually become a senior manager. During this phase, it is most important that you keep the trains running on time. If you last long enough and avoid train wrecks, you become an executive. Hopefully, by then you get a nice parking spot. You are going to need it because the majority of your time will be spent in meetings with your senior managers…making sure they keep their trains running on time.

Is the goal of your career is more than a reserved parking space?
Is the main goal of your career a reserved parking space?

Managers focus on their own numbers

In the Common Management Model, your value to the organization is measured in two ways. First – how many people work for you. Second – how much budget responsibility you have. These measures drive management behavior and corporate culture. If you want to “climb the ladder” it is vital that you find ways to get more people and more budget resources. The bigger your organization, the larger your budget, the more important you become. What you actually deliver is a by-product, typically placed on the back burner.

More is always better in the Common Management Model.
More is better in the Common Management Model.

This model creates an unhealthy culture

The way managers talk about their work is revealing. Ask one of them what they do and you will hear about the scope of their role, not the impact they create, or the results they deliver. For example, “I have 25 people working for me and I am responsible for an annual budget of $10M”. I made up the numbers. They don’t really matter other than more is better. This obsession with management can create an unhealthy culture distinguished by three characteristics.

1. Collaboration is limited

In the Common Management Model managers are not incentivized to collaborate. Rather than work together, managers stay in their own lane and play it safe. Think about it. If my goal is to get more people and more money, then why would I help others. Sure – I am going to be nice, and lend a helping hand every now and then. But, I am unlikely to help you in a meaningful way, to truly collaborate, unless it helps me. After all, if your team does not perform well, then I can make the case to senior management that your resources should be redirected my way. A turf war will ensue. If you think this does not happen. It does. I have witnessed too many of these battles over the years. They are petty and a distraction from getting the mission accomplished.

Collaboration is critical for putting the pieces together.
Collaboration is critical for putting the pieces together.

2. Innovation is stifled

It is difficult for an organization to innovate without collaboration. The more big brains you have trying to solve a problem, the better off you will be. If managers lack the incentive to collaborate (as described above), it is doubtful their team members will fill the void. Innovation is all about new ideas, creative solutions, and better ways of doing business. Sometimes innovation requires new thinking. Other times you simply need the right person to identify some tweaks for improving a process. Either way, the best method for innovation is through consistent collaboration. It is challenging to have one without the other. Without collaboration, teams become limited to their own thinking. Let’s face it – if no one on the team knows a better way forward, then the status quo will prevail. Keep doing the same old same old.

Consistent collaboration is critical for innovation.
Consistent collaboration is critical for innovation.

3. Micromanagement is encouraged

In the Common Management Model micromanagement becomes commonplace. If more management is good, then micromanaging your team is the best method for moving up the ladder. Ask your team for constant status, watch their every move, and do everything you can to make sure it is not your fault when the trains are late one day. Am I overstating this observation? I am. But, I have witnessed micromanagement in spades over the past decade. In fact, some organizations reward their micromanagers with more responsibility.

High performing team members don't need to be micromanaged.
High performing team members don’t need to be micromanaged.

This model affects performance

The common management model avoids pushing teams toward high performance. Rather take it easy. Take it slow. Manage every step in the process. Monitor as much as you can. The good news for micromanagers is that you will rarely be surprised. The bad news is that performance suffers, and your team will come to dislike their work. No one I know wants to be micromanaged. It goes against human nature to want to be told what to do all the time.

No one wants a Drill Sergeant for a boss.

Leadership is the solution

All the Way Leadership! believes that there is a better path to take. A different model to follow. Next week I will talk about a different organization view. One that focuses more on leadership. Just so that I am clear – management in itself is not bad. It is necessary. It is important that the trains run on time. But, I believe leadership is needed for sustained high performance. That is one of the reasons the company is called All The Way Leadership!, not All The Way Management.

Learning about management is not difficult

There are plenty of good books, courses, and certifications you can obtain that will make you an expert manager. Leadership, on the other hand, is more challenging. That is one of the reasons this company exists. To help you become a more effective leader. It will make a huge difference for you, your team, and the organizations you support.

ATW! is designed to make you a better leader

I hope you join me on this journey to raise up the next generation of leaders. The world is in desperate need of more great leaders. Women and men who lead with confidence, clarity, and creativity. It’s time to become the leader that your world needs. Let’s go All The Way!

All The Way Leadership!